Heart of India w Bhutan Pre & So India Post
Published date:
12.10.09
Like all my other 15 trips with GCTOAT, I evaluated this trip in the context of the level of effort required by the trip (very substantial in this case), its costs, and length of the trip as compared to the rewards experienced by taking the trip – basically a cost benefits analysis.
During my just completed exhausting 30 day trip of Heart of India including the pre- and post- extensions, I became an increasingly unhappy camper primarily because of issues I perceived with the itinerary and the scheduling and the air connections, but also because of the less than stellar quality of some of the hotels (e.g., no hot water in showers) and restaurants that seemed to have been selected for suspicious reasons and not the best interests of us travelers. So many days were spent riding in a bus, or waiting for another late plane in one of the shabby frantic overcrowded airports, basically losing a whole days in transit. The Excellent Program Directors (PD) we had on each leg of the journey valiantly tried to overcome the limitations and flaws of the itineraries, but never quite succeeded.
However in the time that I have been back I have reviewed my notes and the details of the trip, and have conducted a detailed research in three different guide books, have conferred with an acquaintance who took this trip with OAT about 4 years ago and thought it fabulous (more on his views later) and have revised upward my overall evaluations of the trip as a whole, and the three parts individually from FAIR- to something a bit higher. This reassessment is based in part on the fact that some of the sitesexperiences on the itinerary are recommended in the guide books as well, even though I would continue to regard them as mediocre andor a waste of time and energy; at least what we saw of them. What is even more disappointing is that it could be a truly fabulous trip if a few seemingly modest changes were made.
A simple summary of what will be covered below in detail is that of the 28 World Heritage Sites that India currently has (currently the most of any country in the world) , the tour visited only 5 of them (Qutub Minar in Delhi, Agra Fort in Agra, Fatehpur Sikri near Agra, the Taj Mahal in Agra, and the temples in Khajuraho), and one of those had been deleted from the trip itinerary even though it had been listed catalog as a site to be visited. Our PD fortunately elected to reinstate that visit. Additionally, the renown Kathakali dance performance during the post extension in Kerala can only be classified as a “Peak Experience” (PE) that should not be missed. Unfortunately OAT classified that dance as an optional tour and could easily be missed by travelers unfamiliar with the dance and its significance. All this might sound OK, but remember that spectacular as these 6 things are, 31very fatiguing days and thousands of dollars were expended experiencing them, and that Delhi had 2 more WHSs – Humayun’s Tomb which was inexcusably not on the itinerary and the Red Fort which I have been told is currently closed – which we did not get to see, in part because we had to visit a silk rug company and listen to a presentation and sales pitch, and go to a home hosted dinner. I believe the OAT priorities in this instance as well as others require serious rethinking!
For the purpose of this review I have organized dealing first with the basic trip, and then the pre- and post- separately.
Main Tour Heart Of India:
The Crown Plaza Hotel in Delhi was the best hotel of the whole trip in that it had ample hot water, provided shampoos and the like, was cool enough with AC, had adequate room lighting, fast elevators that required no waiting, and was near some local shops and markets. Every hotel thereafter was missing one or more of these “essentials”. The Delhi experience was generally good, but we should never have left Delhi without seeing the other open WHS, even if that meant spending an additional day in Delhi (although much of the afternoon of our second Delhi day was free). Incidently, the rug company personnel were rude and pushy. In addition to missing Humayun’s Tomb , there are more than a dozen other sites that one should see such as the highly recommended Hazrat Nizamuddin Darga and the Svetamber Jain Temple and some museums.
An aside relative to Delhi is that traffic is horrendous all the time. Seemingly everything requiring the use of a bus will take 45 minutes to an hour just to get where you are trying to go. Also, Delhi streets, like all the roads and streets in India, are very bumpy. One can get really beat up, particularly in the back of the bus. Related to the subject of traffic is the way those in India drive. I quipped that when the PD was handing out some snacks to munch on because of a late lunch he should also have handed out “Depends” to each member of our party. But crazy as the drivers (trucks, buses, cars, rickshaws, bicycles, etc.) are, they must be skilled because one sees relatively few accidents, and one quickly becomes desensitized to the crazy traffic.
While Jaipur is on most tour itineraries, I remain wondering why that might be so, since most of what we saw there was in no way a peak experience. The Amber Fort is interesting, but it does not warrant the 2+ hours we spent there. Two other forts are recommended in the guide books, but we did not get to visit them. The Jantar Mantar is an observatory including some very large sundials and was interesting. However, the day we were there it rained thus detracting from the experience since seeing the sun on the sundials would have been most interesting. The Palace of the Winds is almost a joke since it is a facade on a building to make it look like an impressive palace. Our tour spent a total of about 10 minutes there taking a photo or two, and that is about what the place is worth. The City Palace looks good on paper (and in the guide books), but is really several poor quality museums plus having to sit through the sales pitch from a local artist who was not very good. We also then had to go to a jeweler’s and listen to a decent presentation followed by 2+ hours of people trying to make up their minds whether or not to buy one of the very pricey baubles. We were then taken back to the hotel where the balance of the afternoon was wasted.
All this might have been palatable if done in one day, but we spent two full days in Jaipur when at least one of those days would have been better spent in Delhi. The Hotel Paradise in Jaipur was a below average hotel with problematic availability of hot water, very slow tiny elevators that we constantly had to wait for one that was not filled, edible but mediocre restaurant, and inadequate room lighting. Plus it was far away from anything.
The game park Ranthambore is also on many guide book itineraries, and does have potential as a stop. However, once again the itineraryscheduling was flawed. The late afternoon we arrived there was an optional tour to the fort and temples and ruins at the top of a mountain adjacent to the game park. The fort and ruins were so impressive that they could be described as one of our India Peak Experiences, and should not have been an optional tour. Furthermore, the tour was undersold by the PD so not everyone took advantage of it. I consider seeing this fort one of the high points of my India experience. We were late starting back and had to come back in the near dark, but it was because of the late hour that we encountered a tiger on the road marking her territory for perhaps 15 minutes of view time. We also saw a large very rare porcupine on the road back as well. That was the only tiger seen by any in our full group during our stay at the park. The early morning game drive the next morning was OK, but we saw no tigers, leopards, or bear. The afternoon game drive departed at 2:30PM, which according to the naturalist assigned to our jeep was way too early by maybe 2 hours. I have no idea why the second game drive was not scheduled for later. We saw very little and it was very hot. Supposedly, with two game drives tiger sightings are fairly common for most visitors. However, if a tiger sighting is really important to a visitor, then limiting a visit to two game drives in a single day should be replaced with game drives over 2 or 3 days.
As a serious photographer, I travel substantially to take photos, and shlep a lot of equipment with me to cover all situations. The optional tour to the fort was supposed to get back to the hotel much earlier while it was still daylight. Hence, I left my big flash and a longer faster lens back at the hotel, and was unprepared to get a decent photo of the tiger. The message here is that India is full of surprises and that one needs to be prepared for the unexpected which I was not, even though I had established with the PD that tiger sighting was very possible on this tour since it was adjacent to the game park.
The Nahargarh Hotel at Ranthambore was, like some other hotels we encountered, fabulous looking with superficial elegance while failing to deliver basic essentials. Dining was primarily on a super long table that all guests sat at. The food was essentially little better than edible. At no time did my room have hot water, no matter how long the water ran. The water was not warm either, but is best described as tepid. The doors were modeled after doors from the mid 19th century in India and were double doors that were secured by a padlock and key from either the inside or outside. What a pain that was. Furthermore, the doors did not seal well and as a result each night the rooms were invaded by thousands of small black bugs, which could be found each morning lining the room’s baseboards dead. Kind of disgusting, really. And, for us and others in our party there were some real problems getting laundry back from the hotel staff.
The Aagman India Camp was actually much better than I expected it to be, since the tents were spacious and had an effective kind of air conditioning. Nevertheless, it was an unnecessary stopover that did not contribute much to our overall India experience. The time spent there would have been better spent elsewhere on our journey.
As indicated earlier, our PD reinstated the stop, which OAT had removed from the itinerary, at the fabulous Ghost City aka Fatehpur Sikri. With the Ghost City plus the Agra Fort and the Taj Mahal, Agra was great. For me the Taj was truly spectacular, greatly exceeding my expectations. After reading during the last year or two that the Taj was being renovated, I expected to see at least some exterior scaffolding, but was pleasantly surprised to see none. On the negative side was first the fact that virtually all the reflecting pools were empty of water (resulting in no classic photos of the Taj and its reflections), presumably for restoration purposes; and secondly, the short tour which OAT and other tour groups have always made to the other side of the river so that one could look back at the Taj had been eliminated by OAT, much to my chagrin. Also, Agra has other highly recommended sites that our single day (2 nights) precluded our seeing. Once again, a great highly recommended location was seriously shortchanged on time due, in my opinion, to itinerary and scheduling flaws.
The hotel and its restaurant were outstanding, with the only fault being that the hotel was not near anything. However, a McDonald’s was within a 30 minute walk.
The transit to Khajuraho was onerous, to say the least, and took nearly the entire day. The WHS temples at Khajuraho would ordinarily have made such a transit worth it if one could have spent an entire day or at least most of a day exploring the many temples. Unfortunately, OAT scheduling once again reared its mindless head and scheduled a midday airplane departure, thus truncating temple viewing. Adding insult was the fact that the plane was [apparently] characteristically late departing [actually, our PD said we were lucky since the plane is sometimes cancelled]. And you have not seen chaos ever until you experience the Khajuraho airport where multiple tour groups are simultaneously trying to bring luggage through a single door into the terminal to be x-rayed where there is almost no space for the luggage. It took our PD nearly 30 minutes to get our checked luggage into the terminal to be x-rayed. It is the worst chaos I have ever encountered anywhere.
We finally arrived at our last stop at Varanasi. The first evening was an optional trip to see the Bhraman priests do the evening ceremony to put the Ganges to sleep. This trip, which started with a very long (20+ minutes?) frantic rickshaw ride through dark very crowded streets with spots of shops occasionally lighting things up, was absolutely essential to the India experience and should have been a built-in and not optional. It is to OAT’s discredit that they made it optional. Regardless, it was chaotic but exciting and well worth paying for. They tell you to take your camera, but it takes near pro gear to properly handle the near darkness of the evening’s events (rickshaw rides, boat, etc.). Unfortunately, I remembered it being described in the catalog (I am looking at the catalog as I write this) as a sunset cruise (which means daylight to me), and once again did not bring the lenses and other photo equipment I needed to handle the lighting (both of the rickshaw ride and once we arrived at the river), all of which was dark well after the sun had set. By the time I realized it was going to be too dark for what I had with me I was already on the bus away from the hotel. It would have helpful if the PD had described the lighting conditions more precisely, but I still must assume much responsibility here as well. Any photographerreader contemplating going to India and doing the night ceremony on the Ganges can contact me at z_q-g.-u@cox.net for further information.
Rising before dawn the next day and again going to the Ganges is a must-do as well. This too started with a whirlwind rickshaw ride (much shorter ride this morning) through dark streets less crowded than the previous evening, arriving at riverside just as the sky really began to lighten before the sun appeared above the horizon. Both these excursions must be classified as not-to-miss Peak Experiences. After the morning at the Ganges, we spent the rest of the day looking at some of the other sites in Varanasi, including a small but really excellent Buddhist museum and a temple complex. Our local guide in Varanasi was excellent. Leaving Varanasi via plane is also chaotic by normal standards, but paled compared to the Khajuraho experience.
The PD for the main tour warrants a special note for a simple but valuable innovation. After the luggage had been loaded on the bus and counted, he always asked everyone on the bus to indicate with their fingers the number of bags they had loaded on the bus (i.e., checked baggage), not counting any carry-on stuff they might have. He is the first and only PD I have had that used this system, that at least once caught a problem before the bus left the hotel. Kudos to him. All OATGCT PDs should be required to use this system.
I would note at this point that the similar tours described in the guidebooks all went clockwise, while the OAT tour went counter clockwise. While this may not seem important, it could be that better airline connections, etc. as well as a better scheduled itinerary could have been realized by going clockwise. As we did it, those ending the tour had to return to Delhi, arriving in the early evening and then a few hours later going back to the airport to catch their midnight flights back to the US. Those of us continuing to the post extension also had to go back to Delhi and the next morning catching the plane south.
A better plan would have been to spend a final day in Delhi touring those sites previously missed, and not forcing exhausted travelers to spend a long day getting back to Delhi only to have to get on an overseas flight just a few hours later.
If I return to India, which I likely will, I would not take the OAT tour given the issues that exist. Nor would I readily recommend this particular tour to others. OTOH, this does not mean that any other available tours are any better, if as good, particularly at the price point of the OAT tour. The reader will have to make his own decision regarding this tour, competing tours, or a more expensive customized tour.
As alluded to earlier, I will note here that an acquaintance of mine, named Sam here for the sake of anonymity, who had taken this trip several years ago had an outstanding PD who was able to overcome basically the same itinerary and fill in the many low spots with great activities and experiences, leading my well traveled friend to call his India experience one the best trips he had ever taken. In response to the early draft of this less than glowing critique that I shared with him, Sam’s response was how could I be so negative about what he considered one of the great trips he had ever taken. We went back and forth with discussion via emails until my traveling companion pointed out that since Sam first described the trip to me when we first encountered each other on a previous OAT trip, he had always said how exhausting India had been and that it had literally taken him many months to recover. Sam and his wife are a few years younger than Pamela and I, and they took the trip several years ago while even younger still. While there were certainly times when Pamela and I were tired, as after a long bus ride, at no time during or after the 31 day trip would we have described ourselves as exhausted. How could it be that Sam and his wife were so exhausted while Pamela and I who were many years older at the time of our trip were not?
After discussing this further with both Pamela and Sam we have concluded that Sam’s trip was simply not the same as ours. Even following essentially the same itinerary (only exception was that due to severe fog they took a 11 hour bus ride from Khajuraho to Varanasi which Sam found to be a fabulous experience seeing India living by the roadside) and schedule, his PD was apparently one of the outstanding PDs (in our 16 trips we have had 2-3 PDs that rose far above excellent to the outstanding level) who filled in the all-too-many low boring valleys between the WHSs and the few scheduled peak experiences with exciting enlightening and interesting activities, sites and discussions. There can be a tremendous difference in the trip experience provided by only an EX PD and an Outstanding one. Our valleys essentially remained unfilled if not downright empty.
I rated our PD (main trip) as excellent because he accomplished the itinerary and the other PD duties at an excellent level. But basically, if it was not on the list then not much was done. So I have concluded that the sporadic itinerary developed by OAT has many gaps (my original sense of the trip) which make the traveler’s India experience too dependent on the PDs to fill or not fill with interesting trip enhancing experiences. While GCTOAT no doubt seek to have the best PDs, building into the itinerary more of those trip enhancements, rather than leaving them to PD discretion, wouldshould result in more even trip experiences for us travelers. The limited space on the GCTOAT trip evaluation forms that everyone gets precludes decent informative feedback to OAT in this regard.
Bhutan Pre-Extension:
The country is a nice place to visit, but it really is not what most visitors have been led to expect from all the literature about it – at least in the areas visited following the OAT itinerary. I would not call it an idyllic Shangri La which is the way it is normally portrayed, but rather it is a emerging modernizing progressive country that is not that dissimilar from what one sees in rural Thailand or Viet Nam. Its main source of income is selling hydroelectrically produced power to India. The people are engaging and energetic, and not the aesthetic types implied by the Shangri La image.
There are no WHSs in Bhutan, nor are there any real peak experiences to be had. There are some nice stops on the itinerary but nothing terribly exciting. We arrived there the last week in Sept and despite what the temperature tables showed, it was very warm in the 80s during the day. Unfortunately none of the hotels we stayed in were air conditioned, which was what was needed. Just leaving the windows open did not get the rooms cool enough for comfortable sleep. The rooms were not posh, but they were comfortable and there was always hot water. In the hotel in Punakha the laundry came back late and still wet!
Ordinarily, I would recommend selecting this pre-extension, even at the rather steep price, if it were not so difficult to get there and back, at least the way OAT sends you through Calcutta both ways. Once our plane landed in Delhi, we had a 3 hour layover before the 2 hour flight to Calcutta. That extra 5 hours on top of what could already be an immense journey from the US west coast can push total transit time to over 30 hours or more. The next day one is taken on a city tour of Calcutta, a city which has very little to offer to the tourist except filth, noise and unbelievable traffic congestion. Both Calcutta and its noisy inefficient dirty airport are best avoided.
At any rate, the following morning one must go through the onerous task of getting through the Calcutta airport security (you will learn that all AA batteries must be removed from all devices and stored separately in checked luggage) and then finally boarding the plane for the approximately 2 hour flight to Bhutan, where you will arrive at what is probably correctly called the world’s second prettiest airport.
A personal anecdote from my Calcutta experience is that when we returned to Calcutta after Bhutan (we were not routed through Nepal like both the catalog and the trip book said – had to re-suffer the grief of the Calcutta international and domestic airports), OAT had issued a ticket in the name of a person who had cancelled her India trip, but did not have a ticket for me to get from Calcutta back to Delhi. Fortunately, the local OAT representative was able to correct this situation, but I was getting very nervous of being stuck in Calcutta (I think the term “Black Hole of Calcutta” should be applied to the entire city) while the rest of the group went onto Delhi and the rest of the tour.
The Bhutan PD was excellent. The food was only OK; the hotels were only OK.
Post Extension The South of India:
This is a pleasant extension which provides the traveler with 3 things. First, it exposes the traveler to Southern India and gives him a glimpse into what the new 2010 Southern India trip might be like. Secondly, the houseboat cruising is an interesting experience, but it does go on too long. The day of arrival you are on the boat before a late lunch. Two nights on board and 1.5 days of cruising were more than adequate. My acquaintance Sam said on his trip he and his wife needed all the days on the boat to regain some strength, but even the happy campers in our group felt that the last day was not needed since cruising had become boring with the redundant landscapes. There was, however, some brief excitement on the last day when our houseboat was struck by another houseboaat causing some real but minor damage. Incidently, our cabins on our boats were air conditioned, which was a very pleasant surprise.
The third thing is perhaps the most important. That is the optional Kathakali Dance Performance which at least several of us felt was one of the high points of the entire India experience. The other itinerary stops were not particularly interesting and were more filler than instructional. For these 3 reasons I would recommend this extension. Incidently, our hotel after the houseboat cruise was the Le Meridian which was an excellent hotel in all respects (except not being close to anything).
My own recommendation would be to eliminate the last day of cruising and only cruise 1.5 days, and then leave Kerala a day early. When we landed in Mumbai we were provided with a decent but short whirlwind tour of Mumbai before leaving for the airport later that night for the flights back to the US. However by getting to Mumbai a day early, a group could have 1.5 days of more in-depth touring of Mumbai which has much to offer in the way of interesting sights.
LAUNDRY TIP: For travelers who do some or all of their own laundry, most of the hotels we stayed in had no stoppers in the sink, so bring one of the stopper mats with you. Most of the hotels seemed to have gone out of their way not to provide anywhere to hang laundry to dry. I have always carried a piece of very thin rope about 20' long for this purpose, but in one or two places there was no place to even hang the rope. In one of those hotels after the clothes had stopped dripping I hung them on hangers from the ceiling air vents where they dried quickly.
Traveler: John from Springfield, VA traveled
on September 21, 2009
Was this review helpful to you?
Yes
No